Arizona Representative Rachel Jones Keshel (District 17) has introduced HB 2974, titled the “Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act,” into the Arizona Legislature.
If enacted, the measure would fundamentally reclassify modified messenger RNA injections under Arizona criminal law. The bill amends existing statutes to designate modified mRNA injections as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction, and it further provides that their manufacture, possession, or distribution may be prosecuted as terrorism, carrying penalties up to life imprisonment if a violation results in death.
What the Bill Changes
HB 2974 amends Arizona Revised Statutes §13-2301 to expand the definitions of:
-
Biological agent
-
Toxin
-
Vector
-
Weapon of mass destruction
to explicitly include modified messenger ribonucleic acid injections or products.
It then creates a new criminal statute (§13-2931) making it unlawful to intentionally or knowingly manufacture, acquire, possess, or make accessible modified mRNA injections or products in the state.
Violations are classified as a Class 2 felony and may trigger enhanced penalties under Arizona’s terrorism statutes where applicable.
The legislation also imposes a mandatory duty of enforcement on state and local officials and provides for civil remedies if enforcement fails.
Not an Isolated Declaration
Arizona is not alone in this classification. Other entities that have declared mRNA nanoparticle injections to constitute biological or technological weapons include:
-
Minnesota Bill HF3219, which advanced similar statutory framing
-
Alliance of Indigenous Nations (recognized as an international governing body by Canada)
-
Our peer-reviewed publication in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons asserting that COVID-19 injections violated the Biological Weapons Convention
-
Expert affidavits filed in active litigation, including from the late Dr. Francis Boyle, drafter of the U.S. Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989
Credit is due to Dr. Joseph Sansone for his efforts in getting both Arizona Bill HB 2974 and Minnesota’s Bill HF 3219 introduced into their respective legislatures.
When an injectable product causes more death and injury than over a hundred Hiroshima nuclear attacks, it ceases to be a matter of regulatory debate. It becomes a matter of criminal liability, legislative intervention, and historical accountability.
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
IPAK-EDU is grateful to FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More
Leave a Reply