This document contains important information for authors. If you are looking for Instructors for authors, they are embedded. However, a limited separate page of instructions for authors is found here: INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS.

Mission Statement

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding across a broad spectrum of disciplines by providing an international platform for the dissemination of high-quality research. Our mission is to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue, promote innovative research methodologies, and encourage the application of research findings to address global challenges.

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law upholds the standard as a leading source of scholarly articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge across disciplines. We invite authors to contribute their best work and join us in our mission to foster objective scientific and scholarly advancements.

Disciplinary Focus

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law welcomes submissions from a wide range of fields, including but not limited to:

• Science: Covering all major branches of the natural and physical sciences, we seek to publish groundbreaking research that expands our understanding of the universe.
• Public Health Policy: Focused on studies that inform and improve health policy decisions, interventions, and outcomes on a global scale.
• Law: Addressing the evolving legal landscape in response to societal changes, technological advancements, and global challenges.
• Clinical Research: Highlighting cutting-edge clinical trials, medical methodologies, and healthcare innovations that have the potential to significantly impact patient care.
• Mind Science: Exploring the complexities of the human mind, including cognitive processes, psychological health, and the neuroscientific underpinnings of behavior.
• Ethics: Explorations of the ethics of science, public health policy, law, clinical research, and mind science.

Types of Manuscripts

We invite a variety of manuscript types, including:

• Original Research Articles: Presenting novel findings and significant advancements in the respective fields.
• Research Letters: Shorter, impactful studies with sufficient detail for full consideration.
• Review Articles: Providing comprehensive overviews of current research trends, developments, and future directions.
• Methodology Articles: Detailing innovative research methods, techniques, or approaches.
• Case Studies: Offering in-depth analyses of specific cases with significant implications for research or practice.
• Reviews and Mini-Reviews: Comprehensive articles that focus on a specific area of inquiry.
• Systematic Reviews: Fully comprehensive articles that present extensive and all-inclusive recent research knowledge from an area of inquiry.
• Meta-Analyses: Formalized statistical assessment of the effect size and confidence of a particular estimate, or series of estimates.
• Predictive Models: Publications focused on the machine-learning development and evaluation of models predicting health outcomes, including response to treatments, risks of adverse events, and other important outcomes worth knowing.
• Correspondences: Encouraging scholarly debate and discussion on pressing issues, theoretical frameworks, and emerging concepts.
• Hypotheses: Rigorously formulated speculations based on sufficient background knowledge such that the question should be addressed by formal research studies and new data.
• Policy Critiques: Analytical articles focused on evaluating existing or proposed public health policies. These critiques provide a rigorous examination of the scientific foundations, ethical considerations, and societal implications of such policies.

Audience

Our journal serves a diverse, international audience of researchers, academics, professionals, and policymakers. We aim to reach those committed to expanding the frontiers of knowledge, addressing societal needs, and contributing to the global academic community.

Submission and Review Process

Submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring the highest research integrity and scholarly contribution standards. We are committed to a fair, transparent, and timely review process, providing constructive feedback to authors.

Ethical Standards

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law upholds the highest ethical standards in publishing, requiring all authors to comply with ethical guidelines for research conduct, authorship, and publication. We promote transparency, accountability, and respect for intellectual property. We follow standards equivalent to or higher than COPE standards. We depart slightly from COPE specifically on forced retractions (see our update/withdrawal/retraction policy above); our policies are better suited to fostering rational discourse and are less destructive of the unbiasedness of scientific literature based upon which future knowledge is drawn.

Open Access Policy

As an open-access journal, we ensure that all published articles are freely available to the global community, enhancing the visibility and impact of authors’ work.

Submission Practices for Science, Public Health Policy & the Law

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is committed to advancing objectivity in science, including academic medicine, public health policy, law, and fields that study the human brain and mind via the dissemination of high-quality research and objective, rational discourse. To accommodate the diverse contributions of our authors, we offer two submission tracks: Track A (Sponsored Submissions) and Track B (General Submissions). Our submission practices are designed to be transparent, comprehensive, and aligned with industry standards.

Track A: Sponsored Submissions

Description: Manuscripts invited by our Editorial Board members, focusing on work that aligns with our journal’s scope and demonstrates significant impact.

Submission Process in brief:

  1. Invitation from an Editorial Board member is required.

  2. Submit through our online system, indicating the invitation and sponsoring Board Members’s name.

  3. Manuscript undergoes single-blinded peer review for scientific excellence. In single-blinded peer review, authors are blinded to reviewers.

Track B: General Submissions

Description: Open to all researchers in each Section’s Field/Subject Area. While we encourage a broad range of submissions, we reserve the right to decline to put any submitted article to review. Submission consideration fees will not refunded.

Submission Process:

  1. Prepare your manuscript following our detailed guidelines.

  2. Submit via our online portal.

  3. Initial review by the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board, followed by single-blinded peer review (authors are blinded to reviewers).

Comprehensive Submission Guidelines

Manuscript Types: Accepts Original research, research letters, Reviews, Systematic reviews, Meta-analyses, Research letters, Correspondences, Hypotheses, Correspondence, and other functional articles as desired by the Editorial Board.

Formatting: Authors must adhere to our detailed formatting guidelines for structure, references, figures, and supplementary materials.  Failure to follow these guidelines could lead to delays in the review and/or publication process or additional article processing fees. Particular attention should be paid to the reference format requirement (as of 7/13/2024, references should use Pubmed format only (however the paper is or would be formatted under the CITE option in Pubmed).

Consideration Fee: A nominal, non-refundable fee (US$90) is required to support administrative review costs. Fee waivers are available upon request but will not automatically be honored.

Article Processing Fee (APF): Applied upon acceptance, with the consideration fee deducted as a discount. Specific fee amounts: US$1700.

Peer Review Process: Manuscripts are reviewed by at least two domain experts, focusing on relevance, originality, and impact. Authors can expect feedback within 6-8 weeks of submission, depending on (a) the availability of reviewers and (b) the complexity of the review process.

Draft Manuscript Withdrawal Policy: Guidelines on pre-review withdrawal are as follows: Authors may suspend, withdraw, or revise a submitted manuscript until the article is reviewed. Following publication, if the authors find an error not based on fraud or are alerted to an error that should lead to withdrawal, and if all of the authors agree with the error and its impact on negating a significant conclusion, they have the option of post-publication withdrawal. Retraction by a journal Section Editor, or by the Editor-in-Chief, will require a fully transparent process by which the reason for retraction is based on data, not mere differences of opinion in interpretation.

Revision and Resubmission: Instructions for revisions, including questions, corrections, limits, and submission process for revised manuscripts, are provided upon review feedback. We accepted Corrigenda and Errata, which are published following the assessment by peer review. Extensive corrections may require that authors Temporarily Withdraw (for no more than 3 months) their paper and provide updates. All extensive corrections may be subject to new peer review, and the paper may be Rejected, Unpublished, or Retracted by the journal editorial board after the re-submission. Failure to return the updated manuscript may result in Unpublication (not identical to rejection), Rejection, or Retraction by the editorial board. The final decision on these matters falls to the Editor-in-Chief. Use of our journal constitutes an agreement to indemnify from liability any consequences to one’s career, reputation, or viability.

Appeals Process: Authors may appeal editorial decisions, with the process detailed by request. Final manuscript decisions fall to a quorum of the Editorial Board.  In cases of extensive revision/resubmission, the appeals process may require an indeterminate time, and authors may be encouraged to seek publication elsewhere after Withdrawing their manuscript. Publication fees are not refundable under any conditions.

Copyright and Access Policy: Manuscripts are published under the CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ by the author. Options for copyright transfer by IPAK-EDU, IPAK PHP, and Science Public Health Policy & the Law are not available.

Data Sharing and Transparency: We encourage, and in some cases may require, ethical data sharing and data deposition in public repositories where applicable, enhancing the reproducibility of research. These terms and conditions of requirement of publication of data may come at any time, and that papers may held in reserve or Unpublished until such time that the data are made available.

Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure: To maintain transparency and integrity, we require complete, thorough, and forthright disclosures of any potential conflicts of interest. Failure to disclose may lead to suspension of publication until authors are unresponsive to detailed disclosure requests. These include funding sources and working relationships within the last five (5) years of the period in which the work or research leading to the manuscript submission was completed.

Authorship Criteria and Changes: Authorship criteria and the process for authorship changes post-submission are: All authors should have made an intellectual contribution to the paper; all should be able to explain and defend any part of the paper, with the assistance of other authors as needed. No “resume padding” authors should be included. All authors agree with the principal conclusions of the paper, and all agree that the research is not fraudulent, manipulated, or intentionally skewed or biased to mislead the readers. Minor differences of opinion (reservations, opposing interpretations) are publishable in the text by reference to the authors’ corresponding initials. Post-publication changes to authors’ viewpoints must be addressed only by submission of a new Correspondence and will be subject to independent peer review.

Language and Editing Services: Information on language requirements and available review and editing services for non-native English speakers are not available. Non-native English speakers are encouraged to have their manuscripts reviewed by a native English speaker familiar with the domain of inquiry.

Submission Portal and Additional Information

Submit manuscripts through our online portal: [https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/product/paper-submission/]. For notices on updated guidelines, including ethical considerations and specific submission steps, bookmark and return to this page.

We are dedicated to supporting our authors throughout the submission, review, and publication process. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law looks forward to your contributions and aims to foster the growth and dissemination of research in the field.

Hypotheses Articles

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is proud to introduce a new section dedicated to publishing Hypotheses articles. This section serves as a forum for the presentation and discussion of novel hypotheses that push the boundaries of current understanding in Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, Ethics, and Mind Sciences. By encouraging the submission of these speculative yet rigorously formulated articles, we seek to stimulate intellectual curiosity, debate, and further research.

Section Scope and Objectives

Innovative Ideas: We welcome contributions that propose innovative theories, models, or explanations for observed phenomena, unresolved problems, or emerging challenges within the journal’s scope.

Interdisciplinary Insights: Submissions that integrate concepts from multiple disciplines or propose interdisciplinary approaches to complex questions are particularly encouraged.

Preliminary Evidence: While hypotheses articles may not require comprehensive empirical support, the inclusion of preliminary evidence or review of existing evidence combined with logical reasoning to substantiate the proposed hypothesis is essential.

Submission and Review Process

Submission Guidelines: Authors are encouraged to clearly articulate the basis of their hypothesis, discuss its implications, and suggest possible avenues for empirical testing or further research. Submissions should adhere to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law‘s formatting and ethical guidelines.

Peer Review: Submissions will undergo a peer review process focused on evaluating the originality, plausibility, validity, and potential significance of the proposed hypothesis. Reviewers will also assess the clarity of argumentation and the quality of reasoning supporting the hypothesis.  Conclusions must be supported by the evidence provided.

Constructive Feedback: The review process is designed to provide constructive feedback, help authors refine their ideas, and encourage dialogue within the academic community.

Publication and Visibility

Digital Publication: Accepted hypotheses articles will be published digitally, ensuring timely dissemination of ideas to the journal’s readership. No preprint publication before the end of the embargo period is allowed.

Promotion: Articles will be promoted through the journal’s distribution channels to maximize visibility and encourage engagement from the broader research community.

Citation and Impact: Published articles will be citable and indexed, contributing to the authors’ academic profiles and facilitating future research on the proposed hypotheses.

Benefits to Authors and the Academic Community

Showcasing Innovation: This section provides a platform for authors to share groundbreaking ideas and gain recognition for their creativity and insight.

Stimulating Research: By publishing thought-provoking hypotheses, we aim to inspire new lines of inquiry, experiments, and interdisciplinary collaborations.

Advancing Knowledge: Hypotheses articles play a crucial role in advancing science, offering new perspectives and challenging established paradigms.

This initiative reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law‘s commitment to fostering an open, dynamic, and objective scholarly environment where bold ideas and innovative theories can be shared and debated. We believe that hypotheses articles will not only enrich our journal but also contribute to the progress of science and scholarship in profound ways.

Methodology Articles Section

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is delighted to announce the addition of a Methodology Articles section across all thematic areas of the journal. This section is devoted to publishing articles that make significant contributions to research methodologies, including innovative methods, methodological critiques, adaptations of existing methods to new contexts, and discussions on best practices in research design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

Scope and Objectives

Broad Coverage: We invite submissions of methodology articles across the diverse fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, and Mind Sciences, reflecting the journal’s interdisciplinary nature.

Innovation and Rigor: Submissions should focus on methodological innovation, the rigor of research designs, and the reliability and validity of research tools and techniques.

Practical Implications: Articles should detail methodological advancements and discuss their practical implications, including how they can be applied in future research and their potential to advance the field.

Submission and Review Process

Submission Guidelines: Authors are encouraged to describe the development process of the methodology, provide a thorough evaluation of its effectiveness, and discuss its applicability to different research contexts. Submissions must adhere to the journal’s formatting and ethical guidelines.

Peer Review: Methodology articles will undergo a rigorous peer review process, emphasizing assessing the novelty, applicability, and potential impact of the proposed methods. Reviewers with expertise in research methodologies will provide constructive feedback to ensure the highest standards of methodological scholarship.

Transparency and Reproducibility: Authors are encouraged to provide sufficient detail to allow others to replicate or adapt the methodology, including any tools, datasets, or software developed as part of the research.

Publication and Visibility

Digital Publication: Accepted methodology articles will be published online, facilitating immediate access and broad dissemination.

Interdisciplinary Appeal: Given the cross-cutting nature of methodological advancements, articles will be promoted across the journal’s thematic areas to reach a wide and diverse audience.

Enhanced Impact: This section aims to enhance research quality and impact across disciplines by highlighting methodological innovations.

Benefits to Authors and the Research Community

Recognition of Methodological Work: This section provides a platform for researchers to gain recognition for the often underappreciated aspect of methodological innovation and rigor in scientific research.

Resource for Researchers: Methodology articles will be valuable for researchers looking to more fully understand and adopt new methods or improve existing research designs, thereby elevating the quality of research across various fields.

Advancement of Scientific Inquiry: By fostering discussions on research methodologies, the section contributes to the ongoing refinement and evolution of scientific inquiry, promoting transparency, reproducibility, and efficiency in research processes.

Methodology is a broad area and can involve meristics and measurements, quantitation, data representation, hypothesis testing, mathematical and logical inference, classification and prediction, model optimization, model selection, and studying the relationship between objects and numbers.

This initiative underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to supporting the foundational aspects of research and scholarship. By dedicating space to the publication of methodology articles, we aim to foster a culture of methodological excellence and innovation that benefits researchers, practitioners, and policymakers alike.

To uphold the integrity of research and ensure the reliability of published findings, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law strictly prohibits certain data analysis practices that can undermine the scientific process and lead to misleading conclusions. This policy outlines specific practices that are not acceptable for submissions to our journal across all sections, including Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, Ethics, and Mind Sciences. Our commitment to ethical research standards demands rigorous, transparent, and reproducible methodologies.

Prohibited Data Analysis Practices

P-Hacking

Manipulating data analysis until nonsignificant results become significant, often through extensive searching across numerous statistical analyses, subsets, or data collection criteria, without proper correction for multiple comparisons. Similarly, repeated analyses conducted to intentionally make an association between medical exposure and adverse events not significant are disallowed. All results must be shown, and formal model selection criteria are strongly recommended.

Model Overfitting

Creating a model that fits the training data too closely, capturing noise rather than the underlying signal results in poor predictive performance on new, unseen data.

Arbitrary Model Selection

Choosing a statistical model based on convenience or familiarity rather than on its appropriateness for the data structure and the research question being addressed.

Failure to Assess Collinearity

Neglecting to evaluate the degree of collinearity among independent variables can inflate variance and distort the estimated effects of predictors in regression models.

Inappropriate Adjustment for Covariates

Adjusting for covariates that are presumed to be confounders without prior determination of the functional relationships among variables potentially leading to overadjustment or incorrect inferences. Adjusting for alleged confounders in the functional pathway between exposure and outcome is prohibited. Means for objective model selection exist and authors should refer to them whenever possible (e.g., Mallow’s Cp, Akaike information criterion, machine-learning cross-validation model selection, generalizability).

Ignoring Missing Data Implications

Failing to consider the impact of missing data on the analysis and drawing conclusions from incomplete datasets without addressing potential biases.

Misuse of Multiple Comparisons

Conducting multiple statistical tests on the same data set without adjusting for the increased risk of Type I error, leading to false-positive findings. Also, using methods that are too conservative to manage false discovery-type risks is discouraged.

Data Dredging

Engaging in the practice of extensively mining data for statistically significant relationships without a priori hypotheses, which risks capitalizing on chance findings. Data dredging in the form of hypothesis generation is acceptable. Still, the manuscript must make clear that the conclusions are preliminary and that no firm conclusions can be drawn due to the limitations of analyses.

Selective Reporting

Only reporting outcomes or analyses that yield predetermined results while omitting those that do not, which biases the scientific record.

Subjective Manipulation of Outliers

Inappropriately removing or altering outliers to influence the results of an analysis without clear justification or transparency.

Compliance and Enforcement

Submissions to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law must adhere to the highest standards of methodological rigor and ethical conduct in data analysis. Authors are required to describe their data analysis procedures in detail, including justifications for the choice of statistical models, strategies for handling missing data, and approaches to multiple testing. Transparency in reporting and adherence to established guidelines for statistical practice are essential for all submissions.

Manuscripts found to violate these standards will be rejected, suspended, or retracted, and authors may face further sanctions, including being barred from future submissions. By enforcing these policies, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law aims to contribute to the credibility and reliability of scientific research, fostering trust among readers, researchers, and the broader community.

This policy reflects our commitment to promoting integrity in research and ensuring that the work published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is a testament to the highest ethical and scientific standards.

To enhance the rigor and transparency of research findings published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, we are implementing a requirement to include power calculations (preferably, curves over realistic to zero effect size) in submitting studies involving statistical hypothesis testing. This policy addresses common issues related to underpowered studies, which can lead to unreliable results and conclusions. Here’s a detailed outline of this new requirement:

Requirement of Power Calculations and Curves in Statistical Studies

Overview

Power analysis is a critical aspect of research design that determines the likelihood of detecting an effect of a given size with a certain confidence level. By requiring power curves for submissions involving statistical hypothesis testing, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law seeks to ensure that studies have adequately addressed the risk of Type II errors (failing to detect a true effect) and have sufficient statistical power to justify the conclusions drawn.

Policy Details

• Inclusion of Power Calculations (Curves preferred). Where appropriate, authors must include power curves or detailed power analysis calculations as part of their manuscript submission. This should be presented in the methods section or as supplementary material, clearly outlining the assumptions made (e.g., effect size, variance, sample size) and the resulting power estimates across a range of effect sizes.
• Justification of Sample Size: The power analysis must be accompanied by a rationale of the chosen sample size, explaining how it is sufficient to detect the expected effect size with an acceptable power level (typically 80% or higher).
• Consideration for Multiple Testing/Comparisons: For studies involving multiple comparisons, authors must address how power is affected and what corrections or adjustments have been made to account for this in their power analysis.
• Transparency and Reproducibility: Authors are encouraged to provide the software or tools used for the power analysis, including any custom code or scripts, to facilitate transparency and reproducibility.

Implementation

Effective Date: This requirement will take effect starting 7/13/2024], applying to all new submissions to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

Guidance and Resources: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will provide authors with guidance and resources on conducting power analysis and generating power curves, including recommended software tools and tutorials as needed.

Rationale

The inclusion of power curves supports the following objectives:

• Enhancing Study Reliability: Ensuring studies are appropriately powered reduces the risk of false-negative results, enhancing the reliability and impact of the research published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.
• Promoting Transparency: We require detailed power analysis to promote transparency in research design, allowing readers and reviewers to critically assess the adequacy of study designs.
• Facilitating Reproducibility: Providing the tools and data used for power analysis facilitates the reproducibility of studies, a cornerstone of scientific integrity.

Compliance

Submissions that present new data as testing hypotheses via statistical analyses that do not meet this requirement may be returned to authors for revision before review. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is committed to working with authors to meet these standards, recognizing the importance of power analysis in upholding the quality and credibility of scientific research.

This policy underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s dedication to advancing rigorous, transparent, and reproducible scientific inquiry, reinforcing our commitment to publishing impactful and methodologically sound research.

To further ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of research published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, additional requirements are established to guide submissions across all sections. These requirements are designed to uphold the highest standards of scientific rigor and ethical conduct, fostering trust and credibility in the academic community.

Additional Submission Requirements

Data Availability Statement

Authors must include a data availability statement in their manuscript detailing how and where the data supporting their findings can be accessed. This requirement aims to enhance the reproducibility and verification of results. Exceptions for sensitive or proprietary data must be clearly justified, with alternative means of validation provided when possible. All clinical and human subjects research must adhere to the data privacy requirements of the IRB, providing the waiver or oversight for the study.

Ethical Approval and Consent

For studies involving human participants, animals, or potentially sensitive data, authors must provide evidence of ethical approval from an appropriate institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee. Additionally, studies involving human participants must include a statement on informed consent obtained from all subjects or their legal guardians.

Reporting Guidelines Adherence

Authors are encouraged to follow relevant reporting guidelines for their study type, such as CONSORT for randomized controlled trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and ARRIVE for animal studies. Manuscripts should include a checklist confirming adherence to these guidelines.

Author Contribution Statement

A detailed author contribution statement, specifying each author’s individual contributions to the work, is required. This promotes transparency and accountability in the research process.

Funding and Acknowledgments

All research funding sources must be disclosed, along with any acknowledgments for non-author contributions to the work. This information provides context for the research and recognizes the support received.

Pre-registration of Studies

For certain types of research, such as clinical trials and studies involving human participants, pre-registration in a recognized public registry is required. Authors must provide the registration information in their manuscript.

Language and Accessibility

Manuscripts must be submitted in clear, grammatically correct English to ensure accessibility to a global audience. Authors for whom English is a second language are encouraged to seek professional editing services before submission.

Figures and Tables

All figures and tables must be high-quality, clearly labeled, high-resolution and accompanied by descriptive captions. Data presented in figures and tables must also be described in the text.

Compliance and Enforcement

Manuscripts failing to meet these requirements may be returned to authors for corrections before peer review. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law reserves the right to suspend submissions that do not adhere to these standards. Our editorial team is committed to assisting authors in understanding and meeting these requirements, recognizing their importance in maintaining the excellence and integrity of the journal.

These additional requirements are integral to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law‘s mission to publish scientifically sound and ethically responsible research. By adhering to these standards, authors contribute to advancing knowledge and uphold the trust in the academic record.

Manuscript Formatting Requirements for Science, Public Health Policy & the Law

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law adheres to rigorous standards for manuscript formatting to ensure clarity, uniformity, and efficiency in the publication process. Below are detailed formatting requirements categorized by article type. These guidelines are designed to be comprehensive yet concise, facilitating a smooth peer review and publication process.

Original Research Articles

Title Page: Include the article title, author names, affiliations, corresponding author’s contact information, and a running title (50 characters max).

Abstract: Structured abstract of 250 words, outlining the Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions.

Keywords: Provide 3-5 keywords for indexing purposes.

Text: Organize into Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. Limit to 6000 words excluding references, tables, and figure legends.

References: Use the Pubmed style, limited to 40 references, numbered consecutively in the order they are first mentioned in the text.

Figures/Tables: Include up to 6 figures and tables. Provide high-resolution images and concise legends. Tables should be editable and not exceed one page each.

Supplementary Materials: Identify supplementary materials, which will be evaluated for online publication.

Reviews and Systematic Reviews

Title Page: Same requirements as Original Research Articles.

Abstract: Unstructured abstract of 250 words max, providing a content summary.

Text: No strict word limit, but aim for brevity and clarity. Organize content logically, highlighting the review’s scope, main findings, and conclusions.

References: Use the Pubmed style, with a higher limit of 100 references to adequately cover the point of consideration (Reviews) or the literature (Systematic Reviews).

Figures/Tables: Up to 10 figures and tables. Ensure they add value to the narrative and are accompanied by descriptive legends.

Supplementary Materials: Clearly indicate any supplementary content.

Meta-Analyses

Title Page: Same requirements as Original Research Articles.

Abstract: Structured Abstract of 300 words max, detailing Objectives, Data Sources, Study Eligibility Criteria, Participants, Interventions, Main Outcomes, Results, and Conclusions.

Keywords: Include specific keywords related to the meta-analysis topic.

Text: Introduction, Methods (including search strategy and selection criteria), Results, Discussion, and Conclusion sections. Limit to 7000 words.

References: Use the Pubmed style, with no strict limit but ensure relevance and currency.

Figures/Tables: Include up to 8 figures and tables, focusing on data synthesis, forest plots, and study characteristics. Provide detailed legends.

PRISMA Checklist: Submit the PRISMA checklist and flow diagram as supplementary material.

Research Letters

Title Page: Include title, author names, and affiliations only.

Text: A concise presentation of novel findings. Limit to 2500 words, with no subdivisions.

References: Use the Pubmed style, limited to 10 references.

Figures/Tables: One figure or table, with a concise legend.

Supplementary Materials: Detailed descriptions of data sources, methods, and related materials as required for publication.

Correspondences

Title Page: Include title, author names, and affiliations only.

Text: Comment on articles previously published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law or elsewhere, or present brief observations. Limit to 500 words (Brief); 1500 words (Long).

References: Use the Pubmed style, limited to 5 references.

No Figures/Tables: These are typically not included but can be considered on a case-by-case basis.

General Formatting Guidelines

• Font and Spacing: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced.
• Page Numbers: Include page numbers in the bottom right corner of each page.
• File Format: Submit manuscripts as Word documents (.docx).
• Language: Manuscripts must be submitted in English. Proofreading by a native speaker is strongly recommended for non-native English speakers.

Adhering to these guidelines will facilitate the review process and enhance the presentation of your work.

COPE Standards

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides guidelines and standards to assist publishers and editors in managing the ethical aspects of publishing scholarly work. The most important parts of COPE include:

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Editors: COPE offers comprehensive guidelines that cover the entire editorial process, from manuscript submission to publication. These guidelines emphasize the importance of editorial independence, confidentiality, conflict of interest management, and the fair and unbiased review process.

2. Code of Conduct: COPE’s Code of Conduct outlines the standards of behavior expected from editors, reviewers, and authors. It includes principles related to honesty, accountability, confidentiality, impartiality, and transparency.

3. Handling Allegations of Misconduct: COPE provides a framework for identifying and addressing ethical misconduct, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and duplicate publication. It offers advice on conducting investigations and taking appropriate actions to correct the scholarly record.

4. Guidelines on Retractions and Corrections: COPE outlines clear procedures for retracting or correcting articles when necessary. This includes issuing retractions or expressions of concern in cases of proven misconduct or significant errors. Our policies are consistent, but we extend COPE to include conflict resolution management mechanisms that facilitate rational discourse.

5. Conflict of Interest Management: COPE emphasizes the importance of disclosing and managing conflicts of interest for authors, reviewers, and editors to maintain the integrity of the publication process.

6. Guidance on Peer Review Processes: COPE offers best practices for conducting ethical and effective peer review, including guidelines on reviewer selection, the review process, and confidentiality.

7. Advice on Ethical Editing and Publishing Decisions: COPE provides resources for making ethical decisions regarding publication, such as handling submissions from editors or members of the editorial board to avoid conflicts of interest.

8. Education and Resources: COPE offers a wealth of resources, including case studies, flowcharts, and webinars, to educate and support editors, publishers, and authors in ethical publishing practices.

9. Promotion of Integrity in Research Publication: COPE advocates for the integrity of the research record and encourages transparency in the publication process, including the ethical handling of research data and adherence to reporting standards.

By adhering to these principles and guidelines, we can all ensure that our collective practices and activities promote the responsible and ethical dissemination of scholarly work.

Retraction, Correction, and Withdrawal Policy

Scope and Purpose

This policy outlines the principles and procedures Science, Public Health Policy & the Law adhere to in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Per the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, our journal commits to ethical publishing practices, ensuring accuracy, transparency, and integrity in all published content.

Retraction Policy

Retractions are considered and issued in cases of proven academic misconduct, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other practices that significantly compromise the integrity of the work. Retractions may also be also warranted in instances where major errors affect the work’s reliability, validity, or reproducibility. The decision to retract is made by the Editor-in-Chief, following a thorough investigation and in consultation with the authors and peer reviewers.

Correction Policy

Corrections, or Corrigenda, are published to address noteworthy errors introduced by the authors that do not invalidate the work’s overall findings or conclusions. Errata are issued for minor errors that do not impact the paper’s scientific accuracy, such as typographical mistakes or errors in figure labels. Corrections and errata are linked to the original article and indexed accordingly.

Withdrawal Procedure

Authors may request the withdrawal of their manuscript if major errors that could impact the study’s conclusions are identified before publication. Upon such a request, the editorial team will assess the situation. If the manuscript has not yet been published, withdrawal may be granted without requiring a formal retraction. 

Suspension of Publication

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law may suspend the publication of any published manuscript at any time if procedures are underway that may substantially alter the conclusions of a study.  Data from a different study are invalid grounds for suspension, retraction, or withdrawal.

Handling Differences of Opinion

• Science, Public Health Policy & the Law recognizes that scholarly debate and differing interpretations of data are fundamental to the advancement of research. As such, the journal will not retract articles based solely on differences of opinion or interpretation. Instead, we encourage open discourse through Letters to the Editor and Correspondence, allowing authors the opportunity to respond to critiques and discuss differing viewpoints.

Procedures for Authors

• Withdrawal Requests: Authors wishing to withdraw their manuscript due to major errors affecting conclusions should contact the Editor-in-Chief promptly, explaining the rationale for withdrawal. These may be Consensus, Majority, or Minority Withdrawal requests. Each will be handled by context-dependent policies of the Editorial Board, the Section Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief.
• Corrigenda and Errata Submissions: Authors identifying significant errors post-publication should submit a Corrigendum. For minor errors, an Erratum should be submitted, detailing the corrections to be made.
• Correspondence: Authors are encouraged to engage with scholarly discourse through Correspondence in reply to Letters to the Editor, fostering a constructive dialogue within the academic community.

Editorial Responsibilities

The Editor-in-Chief, in collaboration with the Section Editor and Editorial Board, and in agreement with COPE guidelines, is responsible for evaluating requests for peer review, retractions, corrections, and withdrawals. The editorial team commits to handling such requests with fairness, transparency, and diligence, ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record is upheld.

This policy reflects our dedication to ethical publishing practices and its commitment to the scholarly community’s trust.

Editorial Structure and Mission of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is a distinguished open-access journal dedicated to disseminating cutting-edge research across the vital fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, and Clinical Research. Our editorial framework is designed to ensure the integrity, quality, and breadth of the scholarship we publish, reflecting our commitment to enhancing human health and alleviating suffering through the advancement of knowledge.

Editorial Leadership

At the helm of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is an esteemed Editor-in-Chief (EIC), who oversees the journal’s overarching vision, strategic direction, and editorial standards. Supporting the EIC, each section—Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Ethics, Mind Science and Clinical Research—is led by a dedicated Section Editor-in-Chief (aka “Section Editor”). These leaders are chosen for their scholarly excellence, editorial experience, and commitment to the journal’s mission. They ensure that their sections reflect the latest advancements, debates, and insights within their respective fields.

Complementing our Section EICs, Managing Editors for each section work tirelessly to uphold the journal’s rigorous editorial processes, from manuscript submission to peer review and publication. Their expertise and dedication are pivotal in maintaining the high standards of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

Editorial Board

Our Editorial Board is a consortium of international, multidisciplinary experts united by a shared focus on enhancing human health and reducing human pain and suffering. Selected for their profound contributions and comprehension of their fields, our board members bring diverse perspectives, rich cultural insights, and a wealth of research experience to the journal. Their guidance is instrumental in shaping the content and quality of the journal, ensuring that Science, Public Health Policy & the Law remains at the forefront of scholarly communication. https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/editorial-board/

Mission and Vision

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is more than a publication; it is a mission-driven platform for a return to objective science and policies based on reality. We believe in the power of research to address the most pressing health challenges of our time, from the molecular level to global health policy. We aim to foster an interdisciplinary dialogue that transcends traditional academic boundaries, encouraging collaboration and innovation that leads to real-world impact.

We are committed to ethical, transparent, and fair editorial practices. We ensure that every article we publish meets the highest standards of scientific integrity and contributes meaningfully to our collective understanding. Through our open-access model, we strive to make this knowledge freely available to researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and the public worldwide, democratizing access to information that can transform lives.

In pursuit of these ideals, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law invites researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute their work, engage with diverse perspectives, and join us in our quest to advance human health and alleviate suffering across the globe. Together, we can forge a healthier, more objective era of research and academic publishing.

Indexing and Archiving (TBA): Information on where the journal is indexed and any archiving arrangements ensure authors and readers the visibility and long-term availability of the published research.

FAQs: A Frequently Asked Questions section can address common queries about the submission process, peer review, publication timelines, and access policies, providing a user-friendly resource for authors and readers.

 FAQs

Q: How can I submit my manuscript to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law?

A: Manuscripts should be submitted electronically through our online submission portal. Please refer to our Author Guidelines per article type in this document for detailed submission instructions.

Q: What is the review process for submissions?

A: Submissions undergo a double-blind peer review by at least two independent experts in the field. The review process aims to provide constructive feedback and a decision within 6-8 weeks, depending on two factors: the availability and responsiveness of reviewers and the complexity of the study.

Q: Are there any fees associated with publishing in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law?

A: Yes, we collect an article submission fee ($90) and an Article Processing Charge (APC; $1700) applies to manuscripts upon acceptance for publication. Both are non-refundable. Details on the APC and waiver options are available by request.

Q: Can I access published articles for free?

A: Yes, as an open-access journal, all articles are freely available on our website immediately upon publication. However, membership allows you to receive notifications of newly published content.

Article Processing Charge (APC) Policy

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is committed to disseminating high-quality research as widely as possible. As an open-access journal, we rely on Article Processing Charges (APC) to cover the costs of publication, including peer review, journal production, online hosting, and archiving. To recognize the support of our members and encourage wider participation in our community, we offer differentiated APCs for members and non-members.

 APC for Members

Members of benefit from a reduced APC as a token of appreciation for their ongoing support and contribution to the field. The member APC is set at $1600, which is $100 less than the non-member rate. This discount is available to any author who is a confirmed member at the time of manuscript submission.

 APC for Non-Members

Non-members are required to pay the full APC, which is set at $1700. This fee ensures that their work, once accepted, is disseminated freely and widely through our open-access platform. Non-members are encouraged to consider joining to take advantage of the reduced APC and other membership benefits.

Membership Verification

Authors claiming the member rate must provide proof of active membership with at the time of submission. This can be done by providing a membership number, a confirmation letter, or other documentation as required by the journal’s submission system.

Payment and Waivers

APCs are due upon acceptance of a manuscript for publication. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law offers a transparent waiver policy for authors from low-income countries or those who can demonstrate financial hardship. Requests for waivers or discounts must be made prior to or at the time of submission and will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Encouraging Membership

We encourage authors to join not only to benefit from reduced APCs but also to engage with a vibrant community of researchers, access exclusive content, and contribute to advancing the field. Membership details, including benefits and how to join, are available via email.

This APC policy reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to ethical, open-access publishing and our dedication to supporting the research community. For more information on APCs, membership, or waiver requests, please visit our website or contact our editorial office.

Science Section

The Science section of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research across the full spectrum of scientific disciplines. Our mission is to foster scientific discovery and innovation by providing a platform for researchers to share their findings with the global community. We welcome submissions of original research, comprehensive review articles, and insightful commentary on the latest developments in biology, chemistry, physics, earth sciences, and astronomy. By bridging diverse scientific disciplines, the Science section aims to promote interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration, contributing to the advancement of science for the betterment of society.

Public Health Policy Section

The Public Health Policy section focuses on the intersection of health research, policy, and practice. It aims to inform and influence public health policy decisions by providing evidence-based research and analysis. This section welcomes submissions on health policy development, implementation, evaluation, and innovation, including studies on health systems, health economics, health equity, and global health challenges. Through rigorous scholarship, the Public Health Policy section seeks to contribute to the creation of effective, equitable, and sustainable health policies that improve population health outcomes worldwide.

Law Section

The Law section of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law serves as a forum for legal scholarship in all areas of law, with a particular emphasis on research that explores the legal dimensions of health, science, and technology. This section invites contributions that examine the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues arising from advancements in these fields, including intellectual property rights, privacy, bioethics, environmental law, and regulatory compliance. By fostering dialogue between legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers, the Law section aims to address complex legal challenges and promote the development of laws that are informed by scientific understanding and public health needs.

Clinical Research Section

The Clinical Research section is dedicated to advancing medical knowledge by publishing high-quality research on the design, conduct, and outcomes of clinical trials and observational studies. This section covers a broad range of medical specialties and therapeutic areas, emphasizing studies that have the potential to impact clinical practice and patient care. We encourage submissions of clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and studies on diagnostic and therapeutic innovations, clinical decision-making, and patient-centered outcomes. The Clinical Research section aims to support evidence-based medicine and improve health outcomes by disseminating rigorous and actionable clinical research findings.

Mind Sciences Section

The Mind Sciences section explores the multifaceted aspects of the human mind and behavior, integrating insights from psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and philosophy. This section is committed to advancing our understanding of cognitive processes, emotional and social dynamics, consciousness, and mental health. We welcome empirical research, theoretical papers, and review articles that address the mechanisms underlying mental functions, the neural basis of behavior, the nature of consciousness, and the application of mind sciences to improve mental well-being. The Mind Sciences section provides a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue and discovery, aiming to unravel the complexities of the mind and its profound impact on individual and societal levels.

Ethics Section

The Ethics Section will publish manuscripts primarily focused on the ethics of science, public health policies, laws, and mind science.

Technical Reports Review, Publication, and Archival Services

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law recognizes technical reports as a key source of scientific and technical information. These reports often contain preliminary findings, detailed methodologies, and comprehensive data from research conducted by institutions and organizations. To support the dissemination and preservation of this valuable knowledge, we offer a dedicated service for reviewing, publishing, and archival technical reports.

Service Overview

This service is designed to assist institutions and organizations in publishing their technical reports, ensuring they are peer-reviewed, accessible, and preserved for future reference. We aim to make these reports available to a broader audience, enhancing the visibility of the research and contributing to the scientific record.

Submission and Review Process

• Eligibility: Submissions are accepted from academic institutions, research organizations, government agencies, independent researchers, and non-profits. Reports should be of significant scientific or technical merit and relevance to the fields covered by Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.
• Peer Review: Submitted reports undergo a peer review process similar to that for journal articles, ensuring the accuracy, quality, and integrity of the information presented. The review process is conducted by experts in the relevant field.
• Formatting and Preparation: Authors must format their reports according to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s guidelines, including abstracts, keywords, and references. Assistance with formatting and editing is available upon request.

Publication and Archival

• Digital Publication: Accepted technical reports are published digitally on the Science, Public Health Policy & the Law platform, making them freely accessible to the global community in line with our open-access policy.
• Archival: Reports are archived in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s digital repository, ensuring long-term preservation and accessibility. DOI numbers are assigned to each report for easy citation and tracking.
• Visibility: Published reports are promoted through Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s distribution channels, including email newsletters, social media, and targeted outreach, to maximize their visibility and impact.

Fees and Charges

A submission fee, and a publication fee are collected to cover the costs of review, publication, and archival. Fee waivers or discounts may be available for non-profit organizations or in cases of financial hardship.

Benefits to Contributors

• Wide Dissemination: Technical reports published through Science, Public Health Policy & the Law reach a broad international audience, increasing the visibility and impact of the research.
• Credibility: The peer review process adds credibility to the reports, making them a valuable reference for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.
• Preservation: Archival in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s repository ensures that reports are preserved for long-term access and reference.

This service underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to supporting the dissemination and preservation of scientific and technical knowledge. By providing a platform for the publication and archival of technical reports, we aim to facilitate the sharing of valuable research findings and methodologies with the wider academic and professional community.

Additional Features Under Consideration

1. Multimedia and Supplementary Content: Authors will be able to submit multimedia elements (videos, audio clips, interactive data visualizations) and supplementary materials alongside their manuscripts. This can enrich the research presentation and help readers gain deeper insights into the studies.

2. Post-Publication Commentary: Implement a section for post-publication peer commentary, where readers can contribute discussions, critiques, and additional insights on published articles. This fosters ongoing dialogue and can enhance the impact and understanding of research findings.

3. Highlighted Articles: Feature a monthly or quarterly selection of highlighted articles chosen by the editors for their significance, innovation, or broad interest. This can increase visibility for selected research and encourage readership.

4. Author Interviews and Podcasts: Create author interview series or podcasts discussing recent publications, research impacts, and future directions. This can humanize the research process and promote wider engagement with the journal’s content.

5. Research Impact Metrics: Provide article-level metrics, such as citations, downloads, and social media mentions, to help authors and readers gauge the impact of published research. This transparency can also encourage more submissions.

6. Early Career Researcher Spotlight: Dedicate a section to spotlighting the work of early career researchers. This can provide visibility to up-and-coming scholars and encourage submissions from the next generation of researchers.

7. Special Issues and Thematic Collections: Organize special issues or thematic collections around timely or emerging topics, curated by guest editors with expertise in the specific area. This can attract submissions of high-quality research focused on these topics and increase the journal’s relevance.

8. Ethics and Professional Development Resources: Provide resources on research ethics, publication ethics, and professional development for researchers, including guidelines, webinars, and workshops. This can help the research community navigate the complexities of ethical research and publication practices.

Conference Proceedings Feature

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is pleased to introduce a new feature dedicated to publishing selected conference proceedings and abstracts from leading conferences in Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, and Mind Sciences. This initiative aims to bridge the gap between conference presentations and academic publishing, allowing researchers to disseminate their preliminary findings, innovative ideas, and latest research to a broader audience.

 Policy for Conference Proceedings

 Selection Criteria

• Conferences must align with the journal’s thematic scope and uphold rigorous academic standards.
•  Only abstracts from conferences implementing a peer-review process for selecting presentations will be considered.
• Preference is given to conferences that foster interdisciplinary dialogue and innovation in their respective fields.

Submission Process

• Conference organizers are invited to submit proposals for including their conference proceedings in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law. Proposals should include details about the conference’s scope, review process, and relevance to the journal’s audience. Email us at info@ipak-edu.org
• Upon approval, organizers will coordinate with the journal’s editorial team to facilitate the submission of selected abstracts.
• Authors of selected abstracts will be notified and asked to provide a final, formatted version adhering to the journal’s guidelines.

 Publication Format

• Conference proceedings will be published as a special issue or section within the journal, clearly identified as conference proceedings to distinguish them from regular articles.
• Each published abstract will include the conference name, location, date, and a citation reference.
• A brief editorial introduction by the conference organizers or a journal editorial board member will highlight the significance of the conference and the selected proceedings.

Access and Indexing

• Consistent with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s open-access policy, conference proceedings will be freely accessible to readers, ensuring wide dissemination of the material.
• Published proceedings will be indexed in the journal’s regular indexing services, enhancing the visibility and impact of the conference and its contributors.

Benefits to the Academic Community

• For Researchers: Offers an opportunity to gain wider recognition for conference presentations and engage with a global audience.
• For Conference Organizers: Enhances the conference’s prestige and academic impact by providing a publication outlet for selected proceedings.
• For Readers: Provides access to the latest research trends, findings, and discussions from leading conferences in their fields.

This feature underscores our commitment to fostering academic exchange and promoting innovative research. By integrating conference proceedings into our publication, we aim to support the dissemination of cutting-edge ideas and facilitate scholarly dialogue across disciplines.

Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals Feature

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is excited to announce the launch of the Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals, a pioneering feature dedicated to compiling and publishing abstracts from webinars that have significantly contributed to the fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, and Mind Sciences over the past year. This feature aims to capture online webinars’ dynamic and interactive essence, making cutting-edge discussions and findings accessible to a broader audience in a citable and archival format.

 Policy for Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals

 Selection Criteria

• Webinars must be relevant to the journal’s scope and demonstrate a commitment to advancing knowledge and fostering interdisciplinary dialogue.
• Abstracts considered for publication must originate from webinars that feature a structured presentation format and include expert speakers or panelists recognized in their fields.
• Priority will be given to webinars that provide novel insights, report on recent research findings, or stimulate significant academic or policy discussions.

Submission Process

• Webinar organizers or presenters are invited to submit abstracts for consideration in the Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals. Submissions should include the webinar title, date, list of speakers, and a detailed abstract summarizing the presentation’s content and key takeaways.
• The journal’s editorial team will review submissions for relevance, quality, and contribution to the field. Selected abstracts will undergo a light editorial process to ensure clarity and consistency.
• Authors of selected abstracts will be notified and may be asked to provide additional information or clarifications before publication.

 Publication Format

• The Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals will be published as a special issue at the end of each calendar year. It provides a comprehensive overview of significant webinar contributions to the academic discourse.
• Each abstract will include detailed information about the webinar, including the organizing body, speakers, and a URL link to the webinar recording (if available).
• An editorial introduction will highlight the year’s overarching themes, innovations, and discussions as reflected in the selected webinars.

 Access and Indexing

• In alignment with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s open-access policy, the Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals will be freely accessible, ensuring broad dissemination and engagement.
• The annuals will be indexed alongside the journal’s other content, enhancing the discoverability and impact of the webinars and their contributions to the field.

 Benefits to the Academic Community

• For Webinar Series Organizers and Presenters: Provides an academic citation for their work, increasing recognition and reach within the scholarly community.
• For Researchers and Practitioners: Offers a curated, accessible repository of the latest discussions, findings, and trends presented in online webinars.
• For the Wider Audience: Facilitates engagement with current research and debates in a format that is both accessible and citable.

This initiative reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to embracing innovative formats of academic communication and supporting the dissemination of knowledge in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. By publishing the Online Webinar Series Abstract Annuals, we aim to capture the vibrancy of online academic discussions and make them a permanent and valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

Free Advertising Policy for Informed Consent and Human Rights NFP Organizations

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law recognizes the critical importance of informed consent and human rights in both research and clinical practice. To support the work of non-profit organizations (NFPs) dedicated to these areas, we are pleased to offer free advertising space within our journal and on our digital platforms. This initiative aims to raise awareness, promote advocacy, and facilitate access to resources provided by these organizations, contributing to the broader mission of enhancing human health and dignity.

Eligibility Criteria

• Organizations must be registered non-profits or NGOs that focus on informed consent, human rights, patient rights, or related fields.
• Advertising content must be directly related to the organization’s mission and provide educational value, resources, or support to our readership.
• Advertisements should be designed for a scholarly audience, including researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and students in relevant disciplines.

Submission Process

• Interested organizations are invited to submit an application detailing their mission, the content they wish to advertise, and how it aligns with the interests of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s audience.
• The journal’s editorial team will review submissions for relevance and impact. Priority will be given to content that directly supports the journal’s mission and its readers’ professional interests.
• Approved advertisements will be scheduled for publication in upcoming issues or featured on the journal’s website, subject to space availability.

Advertisement Format and Guidelines

• Advertisements can be submitted in various formats, including print-ready journal images, digital website banners, or brief video clips for multimedia platforms.
• All advertisements must meet the journal’s quality standards for content and presentation. They should be informative, respectful, and meet the standards of professional advertising.
• The journal reserves the right to request modifications to ensure that advertisements align with its editorial and aesthetic standards.

Benefits to NFP Organizations and the Academic Community

• For NFP Organizations: This policy offers a platform to reach a global audience of professionals engaged in science, public health, law, and clinical research, enhancing the visibility of their work and resources.
• For the Academic Community: Providing access to information on informed consent and human rights supports the ethical conduct of research and practice, enriching the professional development of our readers.

This initiative underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to ethical research and practice, as well as to supporting organizations that safeguard human rights and patient welfare. By offering free advertising to relevant NFPs, we aim to foster a more informed, ethical, and compassionate academic and professional community.

To submit an ad for review and potential publication, visit our Ads page.

Training Program on Methodological Standards

Experts in these areas who might like to be considered for instructors or hosts are welcome to send their resumes via email.

To support authors and enhance the quality of submissions, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is proud to offer training on the methodological standards required for publication in our journal. This initiative is part of our commitment to fostering rigorous research practices and ensuring that studies published in our journal meet the highest standards of scientific integrity and reproducibility. Here’s an overview of the training program and its components:

Objective

The training program aims to equip researchers, especially early-career scientists and those from underrepresented regions, with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s submission requirements. By addressing common methodological issues and promoting best practices in research design, data analysis, and reporting, we strive to improve the quality and impact of submitted manuscripts.

Specifically, we will not assist in the study design or analysis of specific research questions with or on behalf of authors or prospective authors. Participants in this program should expect general, not specific advice from workshop instructors, webinar hosts, and presenters working on behalf of IPAK-EDU LLC.

Key Components

• Workshops and Webinars: Interactive sessions covering various aspects of research methodology, including study design, statistical analysis, ethical considerations, data management, and adherence to reporting guidelines. These sessions are led by experts in the respective fields and include Q&A segments for personalized advice.

• Online Courses: Self-paced, modular courses that provide comprehensive training on specific methodological topics, such as power analysis, handling missing data, avoiding p-hacking, and more. Each module includes practical exercises, case studies, and assessments to reinforce learning.

• Guidance Documents and Templates: A collection of resources, including checklists, templates, and best practice guides, designed to assist authors in preparing their manuscripts. These resources cover statistical reporting, data visualization, ethical disclosures, and data-sharing policies.

• Mentoring Program: A mentorship scheme pairing early-career researchers with experienced mentors for one-on-one guidance on general best practices in research methodology and manuscript preparation. This program aims to build capacity and foster professional development in the research community.

• Q&A Forums: These are online platforms where authors can post questions related to research methodology and receive answers from peers and experts. These forums also serve as a knowledge base, archiving discussions on common methodological challenges.

Accessibility and Inclusivity

The training program is offered free of charge or at a nominal fee to ensure broad accessibility. Special efforts are made to reach researchers from low- and middle-income countries, institutions with limited resources, and individuals whose research may benefit from additional training and expertise.

Benefits to Authors and the Research Community

• Enhanced Research Quality: Training participants gain valuable insights into conducting rigorous and ethical research, leading to higher-quality manuscript submissions.
• Increased Publication Success: Authors familiar with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s methodological standards are better positioned to meet the journal’s requirements, increasing their chances of successful publication.
• Continuing Professional Development: The program supports the ongoing professional development of researchers, contributing to their growth as competent and ethical scientists.

Participation and Registration

Our website details upcoming workshops, webinars, and courses, with registration information on our Community Calendar. We encourage authors and researchers to use these resources to enhance their methodological skills and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

This training initiative underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s dedication to supporting the research community and upholding the highest standards of academic publishing. Through education and capacity building, we aim to foster a culture of excellence and integrity in research.

To further support the research community and enhance the quality of submissions, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is pleased to introduce ongoing workshops focused on the Design of Analysis and Data Analysis. These workshops are tailored to equip researchers with advanced skills in statistical analysis, data interpretation, and the application of best practices in data handling. Here’s an overview of the workshop series and its key features:

Design of Analysis and Data Analysis Workshops

Objective

The objective of these workshops is to provide researchers with the knowledge and tools necessary to design robust studies and perform rigorous data analyses. By covering a wide range of statistical techniques and data analysis strategies, the workshops aim to improve the reliability and validity of research findings published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

Workshop Structure

• The workshops are held on an ongoing basis, with both in-person and virtual sessions to accommodate participants from around the globe. Each workshop includes lectures, hands-on sessions, and case study analyses to ensure a comprehensive learning experience.

Core Topics:

•  Statistical Foundations: Basics of statistical theory, probability distributions, and hypothesis testing.
•  Study Design Principles: Designing studies with adequate power, addressing potential biases, and selecting appropriate statistical models.
•  Advanced Statistical Methods: Multivariate analysis, regression models, factor analysis, and non-parametric methods. Intro to machine learning.
•  Data Analysis Software: Training in using statistical software packages (e.g., R, SPSS, Stata) for data analysis.
•  Data Visualization: Techniques for effectively presenting data and findings using graphical methods.
•  Ethical Considerations: Addressing ethical issues in data analysis, including data privacy, informed consent in datasharing, and avoiding practices such as p-hacking.

Interactive Sessions: Participants work on real datasets to apply what they have learned, with guidance from instructors. These sessions also include discussions on troubleshooting common issues encountered in data analysis.

Target Audience

The workshops are designed for researchers at all levels, from graduate students to seasoned academics, particularly those preparing manuscripts for submission to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law. They are also beneficial for professionals involved in data analysis across various sectors, including public health, policy analysis, and clinical research.

Workshops are led by experienced statisticians, data scientists, and research methodologists. Instructors are selected for their expertise in statistical analysis and ability to teach complex concepts in an accessible manner.

Registration and Fees

• Registration Details: Information on upcoming workshops, including dates, locations (for in-person sessions), and registration link will be published on The IPAK-EDU Community Calendar and emailed to members of the World Society of Ethical Science.
• Fees: A nominal fee may be charged to cover workshop materials and expenses. Fee waivers or discounts are available for students, early-career researchers, and participants from low- and middle-income countries.

Benefits to Participants

• Enhanced Methodological Skills: Participants will leave the workshops with a deeper understanding of statistical principles and practical skills in data analysis.
•  Improved Research Quality: By applying the techniques learned, researchers can enhance the quality and impact of their work, increasing its publication potential.
• Networking Opportunities: Workshops provide a platform for participants to connect with peers and experts in the field, fostering collaborations and professional development.

Commitment to Excellence

These workshops reflect Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to promoting excellence in research methodology and supporting the academic community’s pursuit of rigorous, impactful science. By investing in the development of researchers’ methodological skills, we aim to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the publication of high-quality research.

Policy on Preprints and Prior Publications

We have seen a weakening of the quality and level of evidence being used in the formulation of public health policy. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is committed to the dissemination of original, high-quality research that has not been previously published. To maintain the integrity and novelty of the content we publish, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law has established a clear policy regarding the consideration of manuscripts that have appeared as preprints or have been otherwise published prior to submission to our journal. This policy is designed to ensure that all articles we publish offer significant new insights and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in our fields of focus: Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, Ethics, and Mind Sciences.

Preprints Policy

• Non-Acceptance of Preprints: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law does not accept manuscripts that have been published previously as preprints. Our goal is to publish original research that has not been made available in the public domain before our peer review process.
• Definition of Prior Publication: For this policy, a prior publication is defined as any dissemination of the manuscript in a public and accessible format, including posting on preprint servers, personal websites, or social media platforms, which has not undergone peer review.
• Clarification and Disclosure: Authors are required to disclose any prior dissemination of the work at the time of submission. This includes any manuscript versions that have been posted as preprints or presented in public forums such as conferences.

Consideration of Previously Published Work

• Exceptions: While Science, Public Health Policy & the Law prioritizes unpublished manuscripts, exceptions may be considered case-by-case for work presented at scientific conferences but not published in conference proceedings or other public platforms. Authors should contact the editorial office before submission to discuss eligibility for such work.
• Revised Submissions: Manuscripts that have been significantly revised or expanded beyond the scope of the previously disseminated work may be considered for submission. Authors must provide a detailed account of the changes made and explain how the submission offers new and substantial contributions to the field.
• Republication of studies retracted via weaponized, targeted retraction: The systematic bias of scientific literature to enforce policy narratives has proven damaging to society’s attempt to learn via unbiased science. While fraud is to be eschewed, dissenting views and contradictory evidence should be sought. Therefore, on some occasions, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will consider, via new review, revised manuscripts that have been published but retracted elsewhere. Examples of studies that have suffered targeted retraction: Studies retracted due to differences of opinion in the interpretation of valid results; studies retracted without sufficient detail for reason or rationale by the publishing journal; studies retracted due to editorial discretion likely due to pressure from sponsors. Each manuscript submitted to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will be treated as a new submission; authors should not impose any other journals’ reviews or communication into our process. Do not send them, they will be ignored. We reserve the right to refuse to review any particular manuscript from members and non-members for any reason. All manuscripts fall into a review queue; we do not respond to or participate in expedited review practices for any member or non-member.

Compliance and Enforcement

• Verification Process: The editorial team will verify the originality of submissions as part of the initial manuscript screening process. Manuscripts found to have been published previously as preprints or in other public forums will not be considered for publication.
• Sanctions for Non-Disclosure: Failure to disclose prior publication of a manuscript at the time of submission may result in the rejection of the manuscript, unpublication, and potential restrictions on future submissions from the authors.

 About This Policy

This policy is grounded in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to advancing scientific knowledge by publishing novel research. By ensuring that the work we publish is truly original and has not been previously disseminated, we aim to provide our readers with fresh insights and contribute to meaningful academic discourse.

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law recognizes the evolving landscape of scientific publishing and the role of preprints in facilitating rapid communication of research findings. However, our focus remains on publishing original, peer-reviewed work that meets our novelty, significance, and scholarly contribution standards.

Policy on Managing Author Conflicts

Addressing author conflicts is a critical aspect of maintaining the integrity and transparency of the publication process. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law ensures that all manuscripts are evaluated fairly, based on their academic merit, regardless of any conflicts arising among authors. Here is a comprehensive policy for managing author disputes:

Definition of Author Conflicts

Author conflicts can arise from various sources, including but not limited to personal disagreements, intellectual property disputes, authorship credit, and data ownership issues. These conflicts can potentially undermine the submission, peer review, and publication process.

Disclosure of Conflicts

• Mandatory Disclosure: Authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest with co-authors or institutions that could be perceived to influence the research or interpretation of results at the time of submission.
• Conflict Statement: The manuscript submission should include a statement detailing the nature of the conflict, allowing the editorial team to proactively assess and address any issues.

Resolution Process

• Initial Assessment: Upon receiving a manuscript with disclosed author conflicts, the editorial team will assess the nature and extent of the conflict to determine the appropriate course of action. Correspondences from authors stating differing opinions are encouraged.
• Mediation: For conflicts that do not compromise the integrity of the research but may affect the collaboration, the editorial team may offer to mediate between the parties to reach an agreement that allows the review process to proceed.
• Withdrawal or Suspension: In cases where the conflict significantly undermines the integrity of the work or the collaboration among authors, the editorial team reserves the right to suspend the review process or advise withdrawal of the manuscript until the conflict is resolved.
• External Arbitration: Depending on the nature of the conflict, the editorial team may suggest arbitration by an independent third party, such as a professional society or legal advisor, for complex disputes that cannot be resolved internally.
• Under no circumstances does Science, Public Health Policy & the Law assume any presumed liability for the publication of, or non-publication, of a particular manuscript. Submission to our journal implies that all authors agree to indemnify the journal, individual members of the editorial board, and their affiliated institutions from liability for the outcome of the peer-review process and editorial decisions.

Authorship Changes

• Request for Changes: The corresponding author should request changes in authorship due to conflicts in writing to the editorial office, detailing the reasons for the change.
• Consent: Changes in authorship require written consent from all original and proposed authors, acknowledging the change and their agreement to it.
• Documentation: The editorial office will document all communications and decisions related to authorship changes and conflict resolution for transparency and record-keeping.

Confidentiality

Protection of Information: Throughout the conflict resolution process, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will protect the confidentiality of the communication and the privacy of all involved parties, disclosing details only to those directly involved in the resolution process.

Ethical Considerations

Upholding Standards: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in publishing and expects all authors to adhere to these principles. Conflicts should be resolved in a manner that preserves the integrity of the research and respects the contributions of all authors.

This policy reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s dedication to fostering a respectful and collaborative academic environment. By providing clear guidelines for managing author conflicts, we aim to ensure that all manuscripts are evaluated fairly and published based on their scholarly merit.

Author Roles and Responsibilities Statement

To ensure transparency, accountability, and integrity in the publication process, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law requires a detailed Author Roles and Responsibilities Statement upon manuscript submission, along with obtaining explicit author consent prior to publication. This policy is designed to clarify each author’s contributions and confirm their agreement with the final version of the manuscript and its submission to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

Purpose

The purpose of the Author Roles and Responsibilities Statement is to clearly define the contribution of each author to the manuscript, ensuring that all individuals listed as authors meet the criteria for authorship and have approved the final version of the manuscript for submission and publication.

Criteria for Authorship

Authorship should be based on substantial contributions to:

• The conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work;
• Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content;
• Final approval of the version to be published;
• Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

All authors should be involved in the intellectual rendering of the study and the publication.

Responsibilities

• Contribution Details: Each author must provide a brief description of their specific contributions to the manuscript. This information will be included in the published article to promote transparency.
• Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
• Data Availability Statement: Authors are responsible for ensuring that data supporting the findings of the study are available as required by Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s data sharing policy.
• Ethical Compliance: Authors must confirm that the research was conducted ethically, including adherence to applicable laws and institutional guidelines, and that necessary approvals were obtained.

Author Consent Prior to Publication

Purpose

Obtaining explicit consent from all authors before publication ensures that they agree with the final manuscript as submitted and are aware of the submission to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

Process

• Consent Form: Upon acceptance of the manuscript, access to an online consent form will be sent to all listed authors. The form requires their signature to confirm their agreement with the publication of the final version of the manuscript.
• Verification: The corresponding author will ensure that all authors have provided their consent for publication and for communicating this consent to the editorial office of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.
•  Resolution of Disagreements: Authors must resolve any disagreements or concerns about the final manuscript prior to publication. The editorial office is available to facilitate discussions if necessary.

 Compliance and Enforcement

Failure to provide the required Author Roles and Responsibilities Statement or to obtain consent from all authors prior to publication may result in the manuscript being withheld from publication until all requirements are met. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law reserves the right to take appropriate actions in cases of non-compliance, including manuscript rejection or retraction.

This policy underscores Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to ethical publishing practices and the authors’ responsibility to ensure the accuracy, integrity, and transparency of research published in our journal.

To uphold the integrity of academic publishing and ensure the originality of content published in Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, we have established a comprehensive policy on plagiarism checks and penalties. This policy is designed to prevent plagiarized material’s publication and outline the consequences for authors who submit work that is not entirely their own.

Plagiarism Check Policy

Pre-Submission Checks

• Mandatory Screening: All manuscripts submitted to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law must undergo a mandatory pre-submission plagiarism check using advanced plagiarism detection software. This screening process helps identify any potential overlap with previously published content.  The report showing no plagiarism should be submitted as supplementary material.
• Author Declaration: Authors must declare that their work is original, is not currently published elsewhere, and is not currently under consideration by another publication.

Penalties for Plagiarism

Retraction

• Published Work: If plagiarism is discovered after publication, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will almost certainly retract the article from the journal. A retraction notice will be published, clearly stating the reason for the retraction.
• Pre-Publication: Manuscripts found to contain plagiarized content will be rejected immediately. The authors will be informed of the decision and the reasons for rejection.

Self-Plagiarism

• Science, Public Health Policy & the Law understands that authors often create similar passages and phrases in their own writing with variations on a theme. For our journal, self-plagiarism is defined as two or more passages each consisting of two or more sentences with over 90% overlap in word usage and placement.

Ban on Future Submissions

• Duration of Ban: Authors found guilty of plagiarism may be banned from submitting any future manuscripts to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law for a period determined by the severity of the plagiarism. The duration of this ban could range from one year to a permanent ban, depending on the circumstances.
• Scope of Ban: The ban applies to all sections of the journal and extends to any manuscripts where the offending author is listed as a co-author.

Notification

• Authors: Authors involved in plagiarism will be formally notified of the findings and the penalties imposed.
• Affiliated Institutions: In cases of severe plagiarism, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law may also notify the authors’ affiliated institutions or funding bodies of the breach of ethical conduct.

Prevention and Education

• Guidance for Authors: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law provides authors with guidelines on proper citation practices, paraphrasing, and the importance of originality in academic writing.
• Resources and Workshops: The journal may offer resources and workshops on avoiding plagiarism and promoting ethical research practices.

This policy reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s commitment to the highest standards of academic integrity and the promotion of original research. By implementing strict measures against plagiarism, we aim to foster a culture of honesty and accountability within the academic community.

Policy on the Use of AI-Authored/Modified Text

 Scope of AI Use

• Limited Use Allowed: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law permits the limited use of AI tools to improve the clarity and conciseness of manuscripts. This includes assistance with language polishing, summarizing findings, and generating routine descriptive text.
• Original Contribution Requirement: The core contributions of the manuscript, including the hypothesis, theoretical framework, methodology, analysis, interpretation of results, and conclusions, must be the original work of the authors. AI tools should not be used to generate these critical components of scholarly work.
• Authors assume responsibility for all passages in their manuscripts regardless of origin.

Disclosure Requirements

• Declaration of AI Use: Authors must declare the use of AI-authored text in their manuscript at the time of submission. This declaration should include an estimate of the percentage of the text impacted by AI generation and AI augmentation.
• AI Augmentation Details: The declaration must specify the aspects of the manuscript that were assisted by AI tools, including the names of the AI tools used and a brief description of their application.

Review and Assessment

• Editorial Review: Manuscripts declared to have used AI tools will undergo a standard review process. The editorial team will assess the appropriateness of AI use, ensuring that it aligns with the policy and does not compromise the manuscript’s originality and scholarly contribution.
• Verification of Originality: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law may employ additional tools or methods to verify the originality of AI-assisted submissions, ensuring that the use of AI does not lead to plagiarism or the dilution of academic integrity.

Penalties for Non-Disclosure

• Transparency Requirement: Failure to disclose the use of AI-authored text, or providing misleading information about the extent of AI use may be considered a breach of ethical standards.
• Consequences: Manuscripts found to violate this policy may be subject to rejection or retraction if already published. Authors may also face restrictions on future submissions to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.

 Rationale and Goals

This policy aims to balance the innovative potential of AI tools in enhancing academic writing with the need to preserve the authenticity, accountability, and intellectual rigor of scholarly work. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law encourages authors to use AI responsibly, as a complement to their expertise, not as a replacement for the critical and creative scholarly processes that underpin academic research.

To uphold the integrity and transparency of the publication process, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law has instituted a policy regarding the failure to report the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-authored text in manuscript submissions. Recognizing the importance of maintaining the authenticity and originality of scholarly work, this policy outlines the consequences for authors who do not comply with our disclosure requirements.

Suspension Penalty for Failure to Report AI Use

Policy Overview

Authors are required to disclose any use of AI tools in the creation of their manuscript, including but not limited to AI-assisted writing, data analysis, and generation of text. This disclosure must accurately reflect the extent of AI involvement and detail the specific contributions made by AI technologies.

Consequences of Non-Disclosure

Failure to report the use of AI-authored text or providing incomplete or misleading information about AI contributions is considered a breach of our publication ethics. To address such violations, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law has established the following penalty:

• Suspension from Submission: Authors found to have failed to disclose AI use will be subject to a suspension penalty, prohibiting them from submitting manuscripts to Science, Public Health Policy & the Law for a period determined by the severity of the non-disclosure. The suspension period may range from one year to a permanent ban, depending on the circumstances and the extent of the ethical breach.

Implementation of the Penalty

• Notification: Authors will be formally notified of the suspension penalty, including the reasons for the decision and the duration of the suspension.
• Appeal Process: Authors have the right to appeal the suspension decision by providing evidence of unintentional omission or misunderstanding regarding the AI disclosure requirements. The appeal will be reviewed by an ethics committee or the editorial board, and a final decision will be communicated to the authors.
• Record Keeping: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law will maintain records of all incidents of non-disclosure and the resulting penalties to ensure consistency and fairness in the enforcement of this policy.

Rationale and Goals

The suspension penalty for failure to report AI use is designed to emphasize the importance of transparency in using AI technologies in academic research. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law seeks to foster an environment where innovative tools can be used responsibly and ethically, enhancing the quality and integrity of published work while maintaining trust in the scholarly record.

By instituting this penalty, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law aims to deter non-disclosure and encourage authors to fully comply with our reporting requirements, ensuring that all contributions—whether by humans or AI—are accurately represented in the published literature.

By requiring transparency about using AI-authored text, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law seeks to maintain trust in the academic record and ensure that all published work meets the journal’s originality and scholarly merit standards.

Willful Attempts to Defraud the Journal and the Public

Attempts to malign the journal’s reputation by submitting false studies using artificial data, fictional authors, etc., will be seen as scientific fraud, including any such fraud commited during attempts to test the journal for “predatory practices”.

Paid Advertising Policy for Products, Services, and Events: Terms and Conditions

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law offers a unique opportunity for entities to advertise products, services, and events that interest our diverse readership spanning the fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, and Mind Sciences. Understanding the importance of maintaining the integrity of our academic and editorial processes, we have established a policy to govern paid advertising, ensuring objectivity and transparency in our publications.

 Exclusive Annual Advertising Option

• Availability: Paid advertising space is available on an annual basis only, providing advertisers with sustained visibility to our global academic and professional community.
• Scope: Advertisements may include academic and professional resources, scientific instruments, software, conferences, workshops, and other events relevant to our readership.

Policy on Editorial Independence and Objectivity

• Editorial Independence: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law upholds the highest editorial independence and objectivity standards. Our decision to publish studies, reviews, or any scholarly content is guided solely by their academic merit, relevance to our scope, and adherence to our publication ethics. These decisions are made independently of any commercial interests, including our advertisers.
• Objective Publication: We are committed to publishing research objectively, regardless of its potential impact, positive or negative, on our advertisers’ products, services, or events. Our content reflects the latest scientific discovery and scholarly debate, unswayed by commercial considerations.
• Advertiser Acknowledgment: Advertisers must acknowledge and agree to this policy upon submitting their advertisements for publication. This acknowledgment ensures a mutual understanding that advertising agreements do not influence our editorial content or sway the outcome of our objective publication process.

Guidelines for Advertisements

• Content Review: All advertisements are subject to review by Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s editorial team to ensure they align with our ethical standards, aesthetic criteria, and the interests of our readership. We reserve the right to reject or request modifications to advertisements that do not meet these standards.
• Relevance and Appropriateness: Advertisements must be relevant to the academic and professional interests of our readership and presented in a respectful and professional manner.
• Disclosure and Transparency: Advertisements will be marked as such, maintaining a clear distinction between editorial and advertising content to ensure transparency for our readers.

Benefits to Advertisers

By choosing to advertise with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, entities gain access to a dedicated, engaged audience in the fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, Ethics, and Mind Sciences. Our annual advertising option offers extended visibility, supporting the development of meaningful connections with leading professionals and researchers worldwide.

This policy reflects Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s dedication to maintaining the integrity of its scholarly work while providing opportunities for relevant, ethical advertising that can benefit our academic community. For more information on advertising options and to acknowledge this policy, please contact our advertising department via email.

Statement on Advertising Support for Objective Science

At Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, we are deeply committed to the dissemination of objective, high-quality scientific research across the diverse fields of Science, Public Health Policy, Law, Clinical Research, and Mind Sciences. Our mission is to foster an environment where scholarly work can be published and accessed freely, contributing to the global body of knowledge and advancing human health and understanding.

We recognize that advertising plays a crucial role in supporting our open-access publication model. Our partners demonstrate a shared commitment to promoting and supporting objective science by choosing to advertise with us. Advertisers on our platform are more than just sponsors; they are key contributors to the ecosystem of scientific exchange, helping to ensure that valuable research remains accessible to all.

Support for Objective Science

Advertisers on Science, Public Health Policy & the Law’s platform are acknowledged as supporters of:

• Open Access: Financial contributions from advertising help sustain our open-access model, ensuring that important scientific discoveries are available to researchers, practitioners, and the public without barriers.
• Academic Freedom and Academic Integrity: By advertising with us, partners underscore their support for the freedom of academics to explore, discover, and publish findings based on scientific merit, regardless of the commercial implications.
• Ethical Standards: Our advertisers align with our commitment to high ethical standards in publishing, recognizing the importance of integrity in all scientific endeavors.

Promoting Objective Science

In aligning with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, advertisers affirm their support for:

• Unbiased Research: Acknowledging the importance of publishing studies based on their scientific validity and contribution to the field, rather than potential commercial impact.
• Transparency: Supporting a transparent publication process where research is evaluated objectively and conflicts of interest are clearly disclosed.
• Educational Value: Contributing to the educational mission of Science, Public Health Policy & the Law by providing resources, services, and events that enrich the academic and professional development of our readership.

Weighted Impression Rate Scroll Model and Reserved Right to Not Publish

Tiered levels of advertising are available at submission. Paid advertisers acknowledge that their ad exists in a queue, the contents of which are presented according to a weighting model that corresponds to the present percentage of their support to the journal, considering those who also support the journal. A detailed description of this method is available upon request. 

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law reserve the right to refuse to run, or to stop running, any paid advertiser’s ads for any reason.

Mutual Acknowledgment

By advertising with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, organizations acknowledge and agree to support the journal’s mission of promoting objective science. Similarly, Science, Public Health Policy & the Law recognizes the vital role that our advertisers play in sustaining a vibrant, open-access platform for scientific exchange. Together, we are committed to advancing research and knowledge for the betterment of society.

This statement reflects our gratitude to our advertising partners and our mutual dedication to upholding the principles of objective science. Through this collaborative effort, we continue to support the growth and dissemination of scientific knowledge worldwide.

Ethical Standards and Contract Termination Policy

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law is steadfast in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in all its operations, including advertising. Our dedication to integrity, transparency, and the promotion of objective science guides our relationships with advertisers. To ensure these values are consistently respected, we have established the following policy regarding ethical standards and the termination of advertising contracts.

Ethical Standards Compliance

– Commitment to Ethics: Advertisers on Science, Public Health Policy & the Law are expected to adhere to stringent ethical standards that align with the journal’s mission and values. This includes, but is not limited to, honesty in representation, respect for individual rights, and a commitment to contributing positively to the scientific community.

– Review and Oversight: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law conducts regular reviews of advertising content to ensure compliance with our ethical standards. This oversight is part of our commitment to maintaining a trustworthy and respectful platform for our readers, contributors, and advertisers.

Right to Terminate Contracts

– Termination for Ethical Non-Compliance: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law reserves the right to terminate any contract, written or implied, with advertisers found to be in violation of our ethical standards. Such termination can occur at the discretion of the journal’s editorial board or its designated representatives, following a thorough review of the circumstances.

– Notification: In the event of contract termination due to ethical non-compliance, the advertiser will be notified in writing, detailing the reasons for the termination and any relevant evidence supporting the decision.

 Policy on Standards Modification

– Right to Update Standards: Science, Public Health Policy & the Law acknowledges the evolving nature of ethical considerations in publishing and advertising. We reserve the right to update and change our ethical standards at any time to reflect new understandings, legal requirements, and community expectations.

– Notification of Changes: Advertisers will be promptly informed of any changes to our ethical standards. We commit to providing clear communication regarding any updates and their implications for advertising content and practices.

 Mutual Understanding

This policy underscores the mutual understanding between Science, Public Health Policy & the Law and our advertisers regarding the importance of ethical standards. Our aim is to foster a collaborative environment where advertising supports and enhances the journal’s mission without compromising the integrity of the scientific discourse.

By engaging with Science, Public Health Policy & the Law as advertisers, organizations acknowledge this policy and commit to upholding the ethical standards set forth. Together, we strive to promote a culture of integrity and respect within the scientific community and beyond.

Policy on Research on Advertiser’s Products, Devices or Procedures

In the unlikely event an advertiser might submit a manuscript on a study on their product, devices, or procedures, a special Tripartite Subboard drawn at random from the editorial board will be established to conduct independent peer review. They will document each decision carefully and thoroughly, so, in the interest of transparency, any conflicts of interest among reviewing editor, Section Editor, Editor-in-Chief, and peer reviewers can fully assessed and prevented. If none can be prevented, an outside Reviewing Editor will be hired to manage the review process.