This is part two of a two part discussion with Christof Plothe DO on the issue of Bovaer. Bovaer is a drug marketed as a methane-reducing feed additive for cattle, with claims of reducing methane emissions by 30% in dairy cows and 45% in beef cattle. Its mechanism of action is rooted in disrupting natural biological processes. The long-term effects remain entirely unknown, raising serious concerns about the safety and ethics of deploying this unproven chemical experiment on a global scale.

You can find and support Dr. Christof Plothe DO at:

• Website: christofplothedo.com

The Many Risks of Bovaer

Bovaer, by inhibiting a living enzyme, disrupts biological processes that are essential for proper digestion and overall health. Despite its claims of environmental benefits, Bovaer is classified as flammable, corrosive, irritating, and a health hazard. Additionally, it is suspected of damaging fertility and causing cancer.

Health and Fertility Concerns

Bovaer’s impact on animal fertility is concerning. Research indicates a potential for reduced fertility in male rats, including decreased sperm production and motility. Female fertility remains difficult to evaluate, but the trend points toward a negative impact. The broader implications for human health are also troubling, as human ingestion of Bovaer-contaminated products like milk and meat remains understudied. Despite this, there is little acknowledgment from regulators or the companies producing Bovaer about the possible harm to human fertility.

Environmental and Ethical Concerns

Beyond health issues, Bovaer raises ethical and environmental concerns. The disruption of the cow’s microbiome, essential for digestion, could have harmful long-term effects on animal welfare and food quality. Additionally, the lack of transparency and the absence of labeling requirements mean that consumers are unwittingly participating in a global experiment.

This issue is compounded by the increasing pressure on farmers to adopt the use of Bovaer or face potential financial penalties via manipulated carbon credit systems. Such coercion represents a direct attack on free markets and individual choice, pushing farmers into economically and ethically compromising situations.

The Broader Agenda

Bovaer is potentially part of a larger effort to control food production, reduce the population, and dominate industries. The focus on centralized, industrial farming techniques, combined with efforts to eliminate independent food producers, aligns with a broader agenda of monopolization and control.

Solutions and Recommendations

Rather than relying on pharmaceutical interventions like Bovaer, alternative methods such as regenerative farming, natural feed additives, and a holistic approach to agriculture should be prioritized. Supporting local, independent farmers and promoting decentralized agricultural practices are essential steps toward restoring our food system.

The rollout of Bovaer raises urgent questions about safety, ethics, and long-term implications for both animal and human health. Greater transparency, independent research, and consumer awareness are essential to preserve our right to choose what we eat. The time to act is now.

Related Material

 

IPAK-EDU is grateful to Dr Mark Trozzi as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More