On Pfizer’s official website, there’s a page titled “The Facts,” where the company claims to combat “misinformation and disinformation.”
One of the FAQ questions reads: “Does an mRNA vaccine change your DNA?”
Pfizer claims—without any doubt—that mRNA shots don’t interact with DNA at all. So, you’d expect footnote #9 to cite a robust and relevant study…
Instead, Pfizer was caught citing a paper on a completely unrelated topic.
Footnote #9 refers to “The Evolution of SARS-CoV-2”—a paper that has absolutely NO relevance to whether mRNA injections alter DNA or interact with the genome.
Pfizer is actively deceiving the public—pushing false claims about its gene therapy shots while blatantly misrepresenting scientific studies to justify them.
In reality, at least four independent sources suggest that Pfizer and Moderna mRNA may integrate into the human genome—contradicting claims that there is “no interaction” with DNA.
Aldén et al: Demonstrated that Pfizer’s BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse-transcribed into DNA in human liver cells within six hours.
Kyriakopoulos et al: Demonstrated that mRNA may integrate into the human genome via LINE-1 retrotransposition, Polymerase theta (Polθ), and defective DNA repair mechanisms—pathways that could potentially trigger cancer, autoimmunity, or inheritable genetic damage.
InModia Lab (Germany): Detected vaccine-derived spike protein, mRNA, and SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences in human tissue samples years after the final injection—evidence of long-term persistence and possible genomic integration.
Neo7Bioscience + Univ. of North Texas: Using the REViSS platform, researchers uncovered evidence of reverse transcription, synthetic mRNA persistence, and widespread gene dysregulation in vaccinated individuals—marked by downregulation of tumor suppressor genes (e.g., TP53, BRCA1/2) and upregulation of oncogenic signaling. Molecular instability scores in vaccinated cases were significantly elevated compared to both unvaccinated and long-COVID controls.
When will major pharmaceutical companies finally be held accountable for deceiving the public into accepting extraordinarily dangerous genetic injections?
Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
Please consider following both the McCullough Foundation and my personal account on X (formerly Twitter) for further content.
IPAK-EDU is grateful to FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More
Leave a Reply