HHS makes sweeping changes to childhood vaccine schedule

The following information is from Children’s Health Defense.


The Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced sweeping changes to the US childhood vaccine schedule following a presidential memorandum ordering a review of whether American children are being overvaccinated compared to those in other developed nations.

The directive, signed by President Donald Trump in December, instructed HHS to assess international vaccine schedules and determine whether changes were needed to better protect children and restore public trust.

Under the new framework, all vaccines currently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will remain available and fully covered by insurance. No vaccines are being banned or removed, officials said.

However, the number of vaccines recommended routinely for all children was reduced from 17 to 11. Several vaccines were moved into a new category that emphasizes shared clinical decision-making between families and clinicians rather than universal recommendation.

HHS said the revised schedule now includes three categories:

  1. Immunizations recommended for all children.
  2. Immunizations recommended for certain high-risk groups or populations.
  3. Immunizations based on shared clinical decision-making.

Vaccines protecting against what HHS described as the most serious childhood diseases — including measles-mumps-rubella, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella — will continue to be recommended for all children.

Other vaccines, including hepatitis A, influenza, meningococcal ACWY, rotavirus, hepatitis B, Covid-19, and meningococcal B, were placed in the shared decision-making category.

HHS said the changes were driven in part by declining public trust, falling vaccination rates, and the absence of long-term placebo-controlled safety studies evaluating the cumulative effects of the full childhood vaccine schedule.

“This decision modernizes the US childhood immunization schedule, protects children from serious disease, and rebuilds trust in public health”

US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the review found the US administers more childhood vaccine doses than peer nations without achieving better outcomes.

“After an exhaustive review of the evidence, we are aligning the US childhood vaccine schedule with international consensus while strengthening transparency and informed consent,”
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US Health Secretary

The announcement triggered immediate backlash from legacy media outlets and vaccine advocates. The New York Times and other major publications criticized the changes, warning they could undermine vaccination efforts — despite HHS stating that all vaccines remain available and covered.

HHS officials pushed back against the criticism, emphasizing that the revised schedule does not eliminate vaccines but gives families more discretion and restores what they called a trust-based public health model.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said restoring confidence is essential.

“Public health works only when people trust it,”
— Marty Makary, FDA Commissioner

HHS said it plans to fund new research, including randomized clinical trials and long-term observational studies, and that CDC advisory panels will reassess recommendations as new evidence becomes available.

Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, called the move the most significant shift in US vaccine policy in decades and said it marks a turning point toward accountability and transparency.

For more information, read the full article here.

The post HHS makes sweeping changes to childhood vaccine schedule appeared first on Sharyl Attkisson.

 

IPAK-EDU is grateful to Sharyl Attkisson as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More

Subscribe to SciPublHealth


Science-based knowledge, not narrative-dictated knowledge, is the goal of WSES, and we will work to make sure that only objective knowledge is used in the formation of medical standards of care and public health policies.

Comments


Join the conversation! We welcome your thoughts, feedback, and questions. Share your comments below.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading