mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Found to Have Greatest Cardiac Risk

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

A common question from followers concerns the differential safety profiles of the COVID-19 vaccines. A large-scale study from Korea has revealed some important differences, unfortunately for the majority of vaccine-takers who opted for mRNA products from Pfizer and Moderna.

Yun et al, used the South Korea NHIS COVID-19 database, covering the period from October 2018 to March 2022. This comprehensive database comprises medical claims of 10,663,738 individuals, representing approximately 24% of the South Korean population who received one or more vaccines from February 2021 to March 2022 (n=3,350,855). The variables of interest were the type of vaccine (mRNA/Others) and the COVID-19 status (yes/no). The mRNA vaccines consisted of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/bioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). Other vaccines included AZD1222 (AstraZeneca), JNJ 78436735 (Janssen), and NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax). The primary outcome variable in this study was the occurrence of acute heart diseases. The acute heart diseases included acute cardiac injury (ICD-10: I21), acute myocarditis (ICD-10: I40), acute pericarditis, unspecified (ICD-10: I309), cardiac arrest, unspecified (ICD-10: I469), and cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified (ICD-10: I499). They extracted the date of the initial diagnosis of acute heart diseases and defined occurrences within 21 days after the first vaccination date as potential AEs related to vaccination. The results showed the short term cardiac risks were much higher for mRNA products.

Yun C, Lee Y, Heo SJ, Kim N, Jung I. The impact of COVID-19 status and vaccine type following the first dose on acute heart disease: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea. Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Oct 24;152:e134. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001213. PMID: 39444354.

Of note, important covariates that increased the cardiac risk with mRNA were: contracting COVID-19 at any time, younger age groups, and higher comorbidities or baseline medical problems.

It should come to attention by oversight bodies that public health agencies never studied comparative safety and investigations into why the agencies preferentially promoted mRNA vaccines despite their higher risk of cardiovascular events.

Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying ($5 monthly) or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation

http://www.mcculloughfnd.org

Yun C, Lee Y, Heo SJ, Kim N, Jung I. The impact of COVID-19 status and vaccine type following the first dose on acute heart disease: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea. Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Oct 24;152:e134. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824001213. PMID: 39444354.

 

IPAK-EDU is grateful to Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More

Subscribe to SciPublHealth


Science-based knowledge, not narrative-dictated knowledge, is the goal of WSES, and we will work to make sure that only objective knowledge is used in the formation of medical standards of care and public health policies.

Comments


Join the conversation! We welcome your thoughts, feedback, and questions. Share your comments below.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading