(POLL) 73% say voting system hacking risk is serious

The following is from Rasmussen Reports.


Nearly three-quarters of likely US voters say the possibility that voting systems could be vulnerable to hacking is a serious problem.

That’s according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey.

Seventy-three percent (73%) say the potential vulnerability to hacking is at least a somewhat serious problem, including 47% who say it is very serious. Twenty-three percent (23%) say it is not a serious problem.

The concern crosses party lines. Eighty-five percent (85%) of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 68% of voters not affiliated with either major party say the potential vulnerability is at least somewhat serious.

The survey comes after Dept. of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin wrote in a memo to the White House that voting machine manufacturers have acknowledged using Chinese parts in critical infrastructure and warned that the systems may be vulnerable to hacking.

Eighty-three percent (83%) of likely voters say preventing election cheating in the upcoming November elections is important, including 64% who say it is very important. Fifteen percent (15%) say preventing election cheating is not important.

Majorities across party lines say preventing election cheating is very important: 73% of Republicans, 61% of Democrats and 58% of unaffiliated voters.

Thirty-four percent (34%) say they have a lot of trust in electronic voting systems currently used in the US, and 29% say they have some trust. Twenty-two percent (22%) say they do not have very much trust, while 12% say they have no trust at all.

The survey of 1,105 likely US voters was conducted Aug. 31-Sept. 2, 2026. The margin of sampling error is +/- 2 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work was conducted by Pulse Opinion Research LLC.

To view survey question wording, click here.

The post (POLL) 73% say voting system hacking risk is serious appeared first on Sharyl Attkisson.

 

IPAK-EDU is grateful to Sharyl Attkisson as this piece was originally published there and is included in this news feed with mutual agreement. Read More

Subscribe to SciPublHealth


Science-based knowledge, not narrative-dictated knowledge, is the goal of WSES, and we will work to make sure that only objective knowledge is used in the formation of medical standards of care and public health policies.

Comments


Join the conversation! We welcome your thoughts, feedback, and questions. Share your comments below.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading